Optional moduleSecurity, audit and risk

Wargame

Which network weaknesses deserve attention first?

The decision momentWhen the question becomes urgent

A risk review produces more concerns than the next change window can address.

A risk register alone does not show which conditions have the strongest available evidence or deserve the next investigation.

A risk register contains more concerns than a change window can hold. Wargame ties fragile paths and segmentation gaps to collected estate evidence so the team can choose the next repair.

What changesThe practical result

Focus the next review on the conditions the evidence can support.

Surface segmentation gaps and fragile media paths that warrant investigation.
Connect each finding to the collected evidence that gives it operational context.

Evidence in viewThe evidence it starts with

Rank the fragile paths that deserve the next review.

Reviews evidence for segmentation gaps and fragile media paths.
Surfaces evidence-backed causes worth investigating.

Product viewFindings before the simulation run

Wargame showing a segmentation finding from a disposable estate copy and the evidence behind it. — Findings before the simulation run.

Open the recordSee what the team sees next

Open Wargame in the record.

Open the resulting view, then review the evidence and the next safe action beside it.

The displayed conclusion stays connected to the record, time, source state, and operational question that produced it, so a colleague can review the same decision without rebuilding the investigation.