Your CISO has been chasing the answer for a year. Now it ships through the AV channel you already trust. Utelogy resells CybrIQ. Same contract, same integrator, no new vendor on the masterlist — and a signed monthly inventory PDF lands in the CISO mailbox starting month two.
The diagram below is the simplest way to read what the channel arrangement actually delivers. One representative meeting room on the left. The three audiences inside the customer org on the right. The chevron in the middle names what flows through your AV relationship.
The CISO is asking what’s plugged into the switch port behind every codec. The cyber-insurance carrier’s renewal application now requires documented hardware inventory with a current date. The IG keeps requesting a covered-entity sweep under NDAA Section 889. Your AV team can’t answer any of those from inside Utelyze, because that’s not what Utelyze is for.
Utelogy chose CybrIQ as the Layer-1 device-identification product that fits AV environments without disrupting the AV operations workflow. The buyer doesn’t have to evaluate another vendor, negotiate another contract from scratch, or onboard another integrator. The AV channel you already trust just got a second SKU that closes a compliance question Utelyze never could.
The honest answer to “does adding CybrIQ create more work”: no, because the three audiences who need the output already work separately.
Your room-operations team continues to live in the Utelyze console. Self-healing, MTTR, room-health alerts, utilization analytics — same workflow, same screen, same alerting. CybrIQ runs on the same managed switches without touching that workflow.
The audit-side artifact ships as a signed monthly export (CSV / JSON with SHA-256, plus a forwardable PDF). The CISO doesn’t log into a dashboard for this; the document arrives in their inbox or their GRC platform on the cadence the cyber-insurance carrier and the auditor expect.
Many Utelogy integrators offer managed services for the AV environment. They can operate CybrIQ on your behalf on the same switch fabric, with the same change-management cadence and the same quarterly review. Your team sees one quarterly summary, not two consoles.
Utelogy did the vendor evaluation. The AV channel does the install. The integrator can run it. The CISO gets the artifact. Your AV operations team carries on with Utelyze unchanged.
From: underwriter@your-cyber-insurance-carrier.com
“For the 2026 renewal, please attach a current, signed inventory of every network-connected device in your conference rooms and meeting spaces. Cite the source system. We’ll need it before binding.”
Your asset register has 280 conference-room devices. The wire has 412. The 132 that are missing are exactly what the underwriter is asking about — the wireless presenters, the BYOD laptops on guest VLANs, the contractor-installed signage. Your AV team has Utelogy. They know how the rooms are running, not what is plugged into them.
This is the gap CybrIQ closes — sold through Utelogy as a line-item amendment to the contract you already have. Read why the channel matters ›
Most Utelogy customers we talk to have the same unresolved security question on the same physical ports. The CISO has a 2026 cyber-insurance renewal that names hardware inventory as required evidence. The audit team is closing a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / NIST 800-171 / CMMC L2 cycle and the asset register everyone is leaning on is already known to be incomplete. The IG is asking for an NDAA Section 889 sweep. None of those land on the AV team to operate — they land on the security and compliance team to evidence. CybrIQ is now sold through Utelogy specifically so the customer doesn’t have to add a new vendor relationship to close them.
The audiences specifically:
The agenda: walk Utelogy and CybrIQ against your specific environment, your active compliance program, and the integrator already on the account. By the end of the call you have a one-page proposal you can forward to your CISO and your CFO.
Request a working session